Cookies management by TermsFeed Cookie Consent COMPARISON OF BUSINESS MODELS OF THE STREAMING PLATFORMS SPOTIFY AND NETFLIX.

القائمة الرئيسية

الصفحات

COMPARISON OF BUSINESS MODELS OF THE STREAMING PLATFORMS SPOTIFY AND NETFLIX.


COMPARISON OF BUSINESS MODELS OF THE STREAMING PLATFORMS SPOTIFY AND NETFLIX.
COMPARISON OF BUSINESS MODELS OF THE STREAMING PLATFORMS SPOTIFY AND NETFLIX. 



Economic and Social Development:

COMPARISON OF BUSINESS MODELS OF THE STREAMING PLATFORMS SPOTIFY AND NETFLIX. 


ABSTRACT

The goal of this paper is to factor out the similarities and variations of the commercial enterprise fashions of the streaming systems Spotify and Netflix. Corporations belong to the phase of new media industries that emerge as a end result of digitalization and digital transformation of production processes. The core enterprise mannequin is the equal for each corporations. Spotify approves you to pay attention to song in the subscription model, whilst Netflix approves you to watch video content material in the subscription model. The structures use the platform and two-sided market economic system mannequin and function in a zero marginal price model. The improvement of streaming structures is related with the improvement of postmodern society, and specifically with the habits of Generation Z., The subscription mannequin has come to be dominant in relation to the possession of song or video content. By evaluating monetary overall performance indicators, we will analyze the benefits and dangers of company enterprise models.


Keywords: Netflix, Spotify, subscription, platform economy, zero marginal cost

1. INTRODUCTION


Spotify and Netflix are phase of a new media enterprise that has emerged in parallel with the digitalization of manufacturing strategies and the convergence of media manufacturing and distribution systems. The adjustments that have affected the media enterprise have had sturdy penalties for the tune and video industry, as section of the media industry. The ancient media enterprise generated most of its income from the sale of bodily sound carriers in brick-and-mortar stores. Revenues from the sale of recorded track and video content material on bodily audio media have been the core income of the media enterprise till fifteen years ago. The new song and video enterprise have moved away from the historic mannequin of enterprise method administration below the strain of adjustments that have affected postmodern society as a whole. Instead of promoting bodily sound carriers, the new song and video enterprise grew to become to promote copyrights. The modifications have been dictated with the aid of Generation Z, who grew up with the Internet and started listening to song on the go alternatively of the traditional way of listening to track at home. The very digitization and distribution of tune on the Internet used to be simply an introduction to the critical adjustments that have affected the media industry.


2. LITERARY REVIEW


The give up of the twentieth century used to be marked by means of the digitization and distribution of tune content material in a new form. The transformation took region in numerous exceptional however associated phases: gramophone records, changed by means of CD soundtracks; CD audio carriers had been slowly changed with the aid of MP3, after which streaming systems took over the dominance in the distribution and consumption of song content material (Simon 2019; Fuentes et.al. 2019). With the improvement of smartphones, MP3 audio players, PDAs, laptops, and different technologically superior devices, customers have effortless get admission to to tune and different media content. What marked the imperative exchange used to be the capacity for customers to get right of entry to track whilst on the go. Such a alternate in habits, primarily based on the improvement of track infrastructure, marked a whole trade in habits of listening to tune (Denegri-Knott 2015). The digitized structure of the song content material supplied some blessings over the traditional analog recording in phrases of its first-rate and the size of the recording that may want to be saved on some analog audio carrier.


However, what was once as soon as a sociological/cultural thing of listening to track has been challenged via getting access to massive databases of on-demand tune content material (Arditi 2017). Werner (2020), in his research, seeks to show the connection between gender and the kind of track advocated as a "list" by way of customers of the platform. The improvement of song technological know-how has at once affected the expand of mobility and availability of tune content material and has progressively multiplied consumer manipulate over tune content. A giant variety of modifications that have taken area in the song enterprise have preceded adjustments in different branches of enterprise (Irene 2014; Dholakia et.al. 2015). Listening to music, grew to become from an exercise in which the consumer listened to song himself, into a each day pastime that accompanied all the day by day activities (Hagberg, Kjellberg 2017). Digitized track and streaming offerings permit you to pay attention to track for the duration of all activities, in particular free things to do outdoor the domestic (Kerrigan et.al. 2014). Choosing and listening to tune ("soundtracking") used to be made viable in daily things to do such as journeying to work, work, socializing, and using motors (Fuentes et.al. 2019). Consumption of track turns into a personalised activity, and the building of person musical tastes is separated from the connection with category affiliation (Wright 2015). The improvement of song streaming offerings marked the ultimate quit of the ancient track industry. Streaming offerings Spotify, Deezer, and Apple Music have influenced the entire transformation of listening and enabled listening to track in the motion (Sinclair, Tinson 2017). Technological answer for real-time streaming used in the processing of a massive variety of data, and observed its first utility in on line betting, facts on inventory exchanges, processing of sports activities results, climate forecasts, and others (Maheshwari 2019). Streaming offerings have modified the way we devour track or tune content. Access to the content material that is broadcast is no longer everlasting and ends when the subscription to the track provider expires (Hiller, Walter 2017). Ekberg and Schwieler (2020) factor out that Spotify is a structure of "transactional archive" that you can get admission to on your personal for the period of your subscription, after which you can no longer launch the domestic screen. Sun referred to as Spotify the "heavenly jukebox" that customers have usually been searching for. The identical may want to be utilized to Netflix for the movie enterprise (Sun 2019). At the very starting of its business, in the late twentieth century, Netflix used to be now not a streaming platform. The corporation's enterprise approach is based totally on the distribution and condo of CD media. The younger business enterprise sought to function itself as a competitor to international vertically built-in media firms that produced and allotted motion pictures for broadcast in cinemas. The commercial enterprise approach was once primarily based on renting and distributing CDs that had been mailed (Tryon 2009). In 2007, the iPhone regarded and modified the geometry of the media industry. Not solely did the media enterprise start to trade radically, however the modifications affected all social processes. Netflix already had a series of 100,000 CDs and was once slowly transferring into the streaming industry. This was once a "tipping point" for the complete media enterprise (Curtin 2009). What Lotz characterised as the "post-network era," Cutrin known as the tv "matrix era." In guide of his claim, Curtin noted that the time of linear tv is over and that the time is coming for interactivity in the monitoring of tv content material that has enabled the digital transformation of content material manufacturing and distribution (Curtin 2009). The largest adjustments in the way of eating media content material had been made via Generation Z. The integral exchange in the way of eating is at once associated to the "Netflix effect". Generation Z, grown up with the Internet, is forsaking the mannequin of proudly owning media content material in desire of subscribing to media content material or streaming platform (Seemiller, Grace 2019). Waldfogel (2019) calls them the "all-you-can-eat" technology barring paying for an extra provider or paying as little as feasible for an extra music or movie (Waldfogel 2018). Another equally necessary process, in the context of forsaking the classical tv paradigm, is associated to the decline in demand for cable television, which accounted for the dominant share of revenues related with the tv industry. Streaming offerings took over the target market of cable tv exactly due to the fact of the "Netflix effect". The metaphor of "cable" abounds in a very strong connection with present day technology.


Not solely that, however a coaxial cable that runs via the partitions and permits get right of entry to to the sign in the central room determines a very sturdy presence of technological know-how in every day lifestyles (Burroughs 2019). Jenkins (2006) in Convergence tradition emphasizes the immoderate affect of "cable" in day-to-day lifestyles (Jenkins 2006). Generation Z and the improvement of science in the shape of streaming systems started out with the deconstruction of this structure of technological presence in every day life. Unsubscribing from cable tv is symbolically referred to as "cord-cutters", ie these who reduce the cable. The situation, which used to be even greater dramatic for traditional tv corporations, is marked by means of the time period "cord-nevers", ie these who will in no way subscribe to cable television. This crew specifically consists of participants of Generation Z. As early as 2014, Jenner studied the way in which Netflix fashioned its personal tv software and emphasised that the broadcasting model, ie the managerial model, is definitely special from cable and traditional tv (Jenner 2014).


3.SPOTIFY AND NETFLIX STREAMING PLATFORM


The streaming provider gives customers with the opportunity of developing their very own song lists or the use of already compiled track lists, created via track editors in accordance to the preferences of character person companies (Webster 2019). Digitization and dematerialization of tune archives, in the mannequin of streaming platforms, however additionally the efforts of streaming systems Spotify, Deezer, Apple Music, and Netflix in conquering the world market, resulted in the boom of world recognition of streaming structures and income of subscriber relationships in the world market (Burkart, Leijonhufvud 2019). Building your personal lists on the Spotify platform modifications the way you interpret the basic fee chain because, in the "peer-to-peer" alternate model, song lists are created through the customers themselves, no longer the track content material editors (Kask, Oberg 2019).


With the improvement of postmodern societies, a robust addiction of subscribing to streaming offerings as a substitute of proudly owning bodily sound carriers has developed (Hagen 2015). Music streaming offerings are technologically superior corporations. They use and strengthen new software program and applications, however can't be labeled in the software program enterprise (Parker et.al. 2016; Lozić et.al. 2017). Music streaming offerings have disrupted social family members and social dynamics. Free or in trade for a subscription, streaming offerings Spotify and Apple Music, grant get admission to to song content material or shaped track lists on platforms, with minimal exterior costs, the usage of cellular telephones (Morris, Powers 2015). Streaming platform offerings have made it viable to pay attention to tune tracks that have lengthy been unnoticed in more than a few tune niches (Webster 2019). In the streaming platform industry, Spotify and Netflix use a platform financial system mannequin and function in a zero marginal fee mannequin (Rifkin 2015; Lozić 2019). The dominant structure of earnings is generated from person subscriptions. What differs is the possession of the content material that is disbursed and the age of the customers who are the dominant customers of every platform.


4. METHODOLOGY AND HYPOTHESES


We will evaluate the operations of Spotify and Netflix companies on the foundation of economic reviews in the shape of Form 10-K. We will additionally use different applicable information from the Form 10-K form, such as the quantity of subscribers and by means of chance. As exterior sources, we will use facts from specialised businesses that screen tendencies in the media industry. In the manner of evaluating corporations, we set two primary hypotheses:


* H1 - The business model of the platform economy and zero marginal cost allow Spotify and Netflix corporations high business profitability

* H2 - The Covid19 pandemic significantly affected the business results of corporations.

The basic goal of the research and the set hypotheses is focused on directing further research in this area of the media industry.

5. DATA ANALYSIS


The records evaluation used to be divided into two simple information groups, specifically the Spotify evaluation and the Netflix analysis. Within every records group, records on the monetary end result and the fashion in the range of customers will be analyzed. For each corporations, the evaluation included a length of six years.


5.1. Spotify


Table two indicates the economic effects of Spotify. The facts had been taken from the Form-10K structure and have been tailored to the lookup in the paper. Spotify's revenues, in the analyzed duration of six years, multiplied from 1,085 million Euros to 6,764 million, ie they improved by way of 523.41%. In the identical period, the value of income extended from 911 million Euros to 5,042 million, an enlarge of 453.46%. Cost of income consists of all prices related with paying copyright for track chosen by way of users. As the variety of customers and listeners increases, so does the fee of revenue. Gross earnings improved from 174 million euros to 1,722 million euros or 889.66%. However, in the equal period, complete running costs elevated from EUR 365 million EUR to 1,795 million, an enlarge of 391.78%. Operating expenses, which do no longer consist of the fee of revenue, are greater than gross earnings for all six analyzed periods. In every period, Spotify had terrible EBIT. In 2018, Spotify moved closer to the income area (Lozić 2020), however the style lower back in the subsequent period. Referring to the first hypothesis, we can say that Spotify is no longer a very worthwhile corporation, though it makes use of the platform mannequin and zero marginal cost. The fee of income is too high, ie gross earnings is too low and EBIT is negative. In 2018, Spotify notably decreased losses, however in the following period, losses commenced to upward jab again. The share of gross earnings in revenues degrees from 16% at the starting of the analyzed duration to 25.5% at the stop of the analyzed period. Gross income is growing, however it have to additionally be emphasised how different occasions have affected it as well. Spotify has modified its possession stake to gather copyright, producing marketing income and podcasts and different revenue. At the equal time, gross earnings boom slowed and stabilized at round 25% relative to revenue. The greatest amplify in the fee of income used to be recorded in 2015, after which prices lowered till the closing length when they accelerated via 9 proportion factors in contrast to the previous period.


Spotify's complete income grew at an common charge of 42.8% per year, however the value of income additionally accompanied this increase and grew at an common fee of 42.6% per year. Gross income grew at a price of 65.3% per annum which was once no longer enough to cowl different complete fees developing at a price of 40% per annum. The consequences of the regression evaluation point out that the enlargement of the business enterprise has immediately affected the make bigger in science funding costs, gadget maintenance, and different administrative prices and that the wide variety of users that would assurance economic steadiness has no longer but been reached. The effects of the evaluation are proven in Table four Spotify streaming customers are divided into month-to-month customers and top rate users. Monthly customers are all these customers who use the offerings of the platform at least as soon as a month. They do now not pay a subscription and have very restricted access. In contrast, top class customers are subscribers and use the full carrier of the platform. The outcomes of the evaluation confirmed that the range of month-to-month customers grew at an common charge of 32.3% per 12 months with an interpretation coefficient of 99.41%. The wide variety of top class customers grew at an common price of 49.9% with an interpretation coefficient of 98.21%.


The fashion evaluation in Figure 1 shows a deviation of the extend in the quantity of top class customers from the regression curve. The interpretation coefficient of 98.21% offers us a remarkably excessive simple task of accuracy, however it ought to be emphasised that in the final two analyzed intervals the increase charge falls under the regression curve. The common boom charge in the first quarter of 2019 was once 33.3%, and in the first quarter of 2020, in contrast to the preceding first quarter, it used to be 38%. Both will increase are beneath the common boom limit. From the effects of the analysis, we can conclude that Covid19 did no longer notably have an effect on the extend in the variety of users, nor the income of the streaming platform Spotify.


5.2. Netflix


The economic outcomes of Netflix's commercial enterprise are proven in Table 6. The consequences are taken from the Form 10-K structure and adjusted to the wishes of the analysis. The evaluation covers a length of six years. In the analyzed period, Netflix accelerated revenues through 266.17%. In the identical period, the value of revenues multiplied by means of 231.5%. The end result of such commercial enterprise was once that gross income expanded by means of 340.45%. Significantly extra than the price of expand in income. Increasing the price of gross income above the charge of amplify of the price of income has constructed a steady quantitative earnings to different working expenses. Unlike Spotify, which had a poor EBIT at some stage in the analyzed period, Netflix had a superb EBIT in all evaluation periods. In the duration from 2014 to 2019, working earnings grew from $ 402,648 million to $ 2,604,254 billion. In the analyzed period, running profits extended with the aid of 546.78%. Net earnings rose from $ 266,799 million in 2014 to 1,866,916. million greenbacks in 2019. In total, it accelerated with the aid of 599.74%. In 2015, Operating earnings and internet profits have been decrease than in the preceding period, however after 2015, profits boom stabilized. The share of gross profit, at the commencing of the analyzed period, used to be about 32% of complete revenue. In the ultimate two analyzed periods, the share of gross profits started out to develop significantly. The value of income grew till 2017, after which they stabilized at an enlarge of about 24%. The effects of the evaluation are proven in Table 7. Netflix's income grew at an common price of up to 30.5% per annum with a diploma of interpretation of 99.72%. Cost of income grew at an common price of 27.9% per yr with a diploma of interpretation of 99.73%.


An extend in the fee of income much less than an enlarge in income allowed for an expand in gross profit. The common make bigger in gross earnings used to be 35.4% per annum with a diploma of interpretation of 98.48%. In the identical period, the amplify in working profits used to be 53.9% with a diploma of interpretation of 85.84%. Net profits recorded a enormous decline in two of the six intervals analyzed. This is the cause why the interpretation fee has fallen under 80% so we can't take delivery of it in the facts analysis. Using the chain index method, we got an average make bigger in internet profits of 73.7% per year. The greatest share expand used to be in 2017, after which income boom slowed. The consequences of the evaluation are proven in Table eight The evaluation of the vogue in the range of subscribers in the analyzed length suggests a non-stop increase in the range of subscribers.


The variety of subscribers improved from 21.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 to 193 million in the 2nd quarter of 2020. The common boom fee from the fourth quarter of 2011 to the fourth quarter of 2019 used to be 28.9% with a diploma of interpretation of 99.2%. The evaluation of the style in the range of subscribers from 12 months to 12 months files a declining increase in the wide variety of users. In the final analyzed period, the share extend in the variety of customers was once the smallest of all analyzed durations and amounted to a 20% make bigger in contrast to the preceding period. The consequences of the evaluation are proven in Figure two and Table 9.


Netflix produces its personal media content material that it distributes to the platform's subscribers. Once the content material is positioned on the platform and constant charges are paid, the variable fees of every subsequent broadcast are shut to zero, which potential the usage of the zero marginal price model. According to the consequences of income evaluation and income trends, Netflix is a very worthwhile platform and we can affirm the first hypothesis. The expand in the wide variety of customers in 2019 was once 20% greater than in the preceding year, however this is the lowest proportion expand in the wide variety of customers of all analyzed periods. Consequently, we can't verify the 2nd hypothesis.


6.DISCUSSION


The analysis of the business results of the two corporations in the field of platform economics showed very different results. We will list six key points that will make it easier for us to interpret the hypotheses:


* Spotify is growing revenue, but is still insufficient for positive business. In all six analysed periods, it had a negative EBIT.

* Gross profit Spotify is small to create enough funds for a positive financial result.

* The first hypothesis cannot be confirmed in the case of Spotify because it has not generated positive operating income in the last six years. We cannot confirm the second hypothesis because the Covid19 crisis did not significantly affect financial operations or the movement of the number of users.

* Netflix is continuously increasing revenue and gross profit and is extremely profitable.

* The growth in the number of Netflix subscribers is slowing down.

* Despite the Covid19 crisis, the growth trend in the number of users continued as before the crisis.

Spotify is increasing in the world market and investing in the improvement of technology, which makes its monetary scenario extra difficult. Investing in science and increasing in the international market lets in it to enlarge the range of subscribers, however continually creates new losses. The boom of customers is non-stop regardless of Covid19 and there was once no substantial extend or reduce in the variety of users.


We can't verify either the first or the 2d hypothesis. Netflix is extraordinarily profitable, however the boom in the variety of customers is slowly slowing down. We can affirm the first hypothesis, however in the 2d it is critical to behavior extra lookup due to the fact the variety of customers is developing in a sluggish trend, regardless of Covid19.


7.CONCLUSION


The evaluation of the outcomes of the two companies running in the platform economic system mannequin confirmed pretty unique results. Both companies are streaming systems and the largest income comes from subscribing to content. Research has proven that the use of a zero marginal price mannequin does no longer have to be notably profitable. Spotify is unprofitable, not like Netflix which will increase income from yr to year. The purpose can be discovered in the possession of the content material being broadcast. Netflix produces its content material and does no longer have to pay for copyright. We can solely take delivery of the first speculation with Netflix. The 2d speculation indicates how postmodern societies have modified person habits and how the world pandemic has little have an effect on on the operations of companies in the media industry. New lookup ought to center of attention on the correlation between habits in postmodern society and the managerial techniques of media corporations.









































References



LITERATURE:

1. Arditi, D. (2017). "Digital Subscriptions: The Unending Consumption of Music in the Digital Era". Popular Music and Society. Volume 41, (3), pp. 302-318.

2. Burkart, P.; Leijonhufvud, S. (2019). "The Spotification of public service media". The Information Society.35:4, 173-183.

3. Burroughs. B. (2019). "House of Netflix: Streaming media and digital lore". Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture. 17:1.

4. Curtin, M. (2009). "Matrix media". (Eds.), Tay, J.; Turner, G. Television studies after TV: Understanding television in the post-broadcast era. pp. 9-19.

5. Denegri-Knott, J. (2015), "MP3", Consumption Markets and Culture, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 397-401.

6. Dholakia, N., Reyes, I.; Bonoff, J. (2015), "Mobile media: from legato to staccato, isochronal consumptions capes", Consumption Markets and Culture, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 1024.

7. Ekberg, N.; Schwieler, E. (2020). "Evolving Bildung, technology and streaming art". Popular Communication.

8. Fuentes, C.; Hagberg, J.; Kjellberg, H. (2019). "Soundtracking: music listening practices in the digital age ". European Journal of Marketing., pp. 483-503.

9. Hagberg, J.; Kjellberg, H. (2017). "Digitalized music: entangling consumption practices", (Eds). Cochoy, F.; Hagberg, J.; Peterson McIntyre, M.; Sörum, N. Digitalizing Consumption: how devices shape consumer culture, Routledge, pp. 167-189.

10. Hagen, A.N. (2015). "The Playlist Experience: Personal Playlist in Music Streaming Services". Popular Music and Society, 38:5, 625-645.

11. Hiller, S. R.; Walter, M.J. (2017). The rise of Streaming Music and Implication for Music Production. Rev Netw Econ; 16(4): 351-385.

12. Irene, C.L.Ng. (2014) Creating New Markets in the Digital Economy, Cambridge University Press.

13. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: NYU Press.

14. Jenner, M. (2014). "Is this TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and binge-watching". New Media & Society.

15. Kask, J.; Oberg, C. (2019). "Why majors surge in the post-disruptive recording industry". European Journal of Marketing. Vol.53, No.3, pp. 442-462.

16. Kerrigan, F.; Larsen, G.; Hanratty, S.; Korta, K. (2014). "Gimme shelter': experiencing pleasurable escape through the musicalisation of running", Marketing Theory, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 147-166.

17. Lozić, J. (2019). "Zero marginal cost in magazine industry: Changing of cost paradigm in "new" magazine industry. 44th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development. ESD Conference Split., p.p. 125-136.

18. Lozić, J. (2020). "Spotify stabilizira poslovanje: Unicorn ekonomije platformi na pragu zrele faze". Polytechnic & design. 8(2), pp. 83-88.

19. Lozić, J.; Milković, M.; Lozić, I. (2017). "Economics of platforms and changes in management paradigms: Transformation of production system from linear to circular model". Economic and Social Development 26th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - "Building Resilient Society". Zagreb, str. 125-136.

20. Maheshwari, A. (2019). Digital Transformation: Building Intelligent Enterprises. Wiley & Sons.

21. Morris, J. W.; Powers, D. (2015). "Control, curation and musical experience in streaming music services ". Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 106-122.

22. Netflix https://www.netflixinvestor.com/financials/annual-reports-and-proxies/default.aspx [21.09.2020.]

23. Parker, G.G.; Van Alisyne, M.W.; Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. W.W. Northon & Company.

24. Rifkin, J. (2015) The zero marginal cost society: The Internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism, Palgrave Macmillan, St. Martin's Press LLC.

25. Seemiller, C.; Grace, M. (2019). Generation Z: A century in a making. Routledge.

26. Simon, J.P. (2019). "New players in the music industry: lifeboats or killer whales? The role of streaming platforms. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, pp. 525-549.

27. Sinclair, G.; Tinson, J. (2017). "Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption". Journal of Business Research, Vol. 71, pp. 1-9.

28. Spotify - https://investors.spotify.com/financials/default.aspx. [21.09.2020.]

29. Sun, H. (2019). Digital Revolution Tamed: The Case of the Recording Industry. Palgrave Macmillan.

30. Tryon, C. (2009). Reinventing cinema: Movies in the age of media convergence. Rutgers University Press.

31. Waldfogel, J. (2018). Digital Renaissance: What Data and Economics Tell Us about the Future of Popular Culture. Princeton University Press.

32. Webster, J. (2019). "Taste in the platform age: music streaming services and new forms of class distinction". Information, Communication & Society.

33. Werner, A. (2020). "Organizing music, organizing gender: algorithmic culture and Spotify recommendations". Popular Communication. 18:1, 78-90.

34. Wright, D. (2015). Understanding cultural taste: Sensation, skill and sensibility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

تعليقات

التنقل السريع